International sanctions kill an estimated 564,000 people every year — more than five times the annual death toll of armed conflict. The evidence comes from a peer-reviewed study in The Lancet Global Health, August 2025. The countries imposing them are technically at peace.
"Sanctions are something more tremendous than war."
— Woodrow Wilson, 1919
Angus Deaton (Nobel 2015) showed that aid makes governments accountable to donors, not citizens.
Joseph Stiglitz (Nobel 2001, fired from the World Bank for saying it) showed that IMF conditions were designed to open markets for Western capital, not build functional economies.
The Lancet has now shown that sanctions kill at the scale of a medium-sized war — invisibly, annually, with named decision-makers who face no accountability.
01
The death counter
A real-time estimate of deaths attributable to unilateral sanctions, based on the Lancet 2025 figure of 564,258 per year — or roughly one death every 56 seconds.
estimated deaths from unilateral sanctions
0
deaths since you opened this page
Deaths per day
1,546
Deaths per hour
64
Per minute
1.07
Children under 551%
Ages 60–8026%
Other age groups23%
Source: Rodríguez, Rendón & Weisbrot. Lancet Global Health 2025. 564,258 deaths/year (95% CI 367,838–760,677) from unilateral sanctions. US sanctions are the primary driver. UN sanctions show no statistically significant effect.
02
Who is being sanctioned — and by whom
The US, EU, and UN together represent a small fraction of the world's nations but control access to the global financial system. Click any highlighted country to see the sanctions regime and estimated mortality impact.
US unilateral
EU unilateral
UN multilateral
Multiple senders
No sanctions
Click a highlighted country to see sanctions detail and estimated mortality.
Sources: Global Sanctions Database (GSDB); Rodríguez et al., Lancet Global Health 2025. Per-country mortality figures are proportional approximations weighted by population share — the study does not publish country-level breakdowns. UN-only sanctions show no statistically significant mortality effect.
03
Deaths are not distributed equally
Duration compounds the effect. A country sanctioned for 60 years carries a 1.7× mortality weight versus one sanctioned for 2 years — a direct finding of the Lancet event-study analysis. Iran and Cuba dominate not just because of population but because of time.
Ranked by estimated deaths / year
By population & duration
Click a country to see detail.
Duration weighting: <3 years = 1.0×, 3–6 years = 1.3×, 7+ years = 1.7×, based on event-study findings in Rodríguez et al. 2025 (Fig. 1). Estimates are illustrative — the study does not publish country-level breakdowns.
04
Two levers. One government.
The United States is simultaneously the world's largest foreign aid donor and its most prolific sanctions imposer. A second 2025 Lancet study found USAID programmes averted 91.8 million deaths over 20 years. The current administration is cutting the aid. The sanctions remain.
Deaton showed aid creates dependency. Stiglitz showed IMF conditions serve creditors. Both critiques are valid — and yet the specific USAID health programmes (vaccines, malaria nets, maternal care) demonstrably saved lives at scale. Cutting those programmes while keeping sanctions in place is not reform. It is a transfer of the killing from one instrument to another, while removing the only one that was saving lives.
US aid — lives saved / year
~4.6M
USAID averted ~91M deaths over 20 years. Lancet 2025.
US sanctions — deaths caused / year
~564k
Unilateral sanctions cause ~564k deaths/yr. Lancet 2025.
USAID cuts — projected deaths by 2030
14M+
Additional deaths from current USAID dismantling. Lancet 2025.
Net position — aid cut + sanctions kept
~5.2M
Estimated annual deaths once aid savings are removed. Illustrative.
Aid lives saved: Rearte et al., The Lancet, June 2025 — 91.8M deaths averted over 20 years (~4.6M/yr).
Sanctions deaths: Rodríguez, Rendón & Weisbrot, Lancet Global Health, August 2025 — 564,258/yr.
USAID cuts: same Lancet 2025 study — 14M+ additional deaths by 2030 if cuts proceed.
Both studies are peer-reviewed, open access.